The Digital Land Survey Plan Registry: A New Tool in Combating Land Grabbing in Oyo State.
Introduction
The administration of land in Nigeria has, for decades, been plagued by systemic challenges ranging from poor record keeping and cumbersome registration processes to fraudulent transactions, boundary disputes and the notorious activities of land grabbers. Despite the central role land plays in economic development, urban planning, housing, agriculture and infrastructure, weaknesses in land administration have continued to undermine security of title and discourage real estate investment.
These challenges are particularly pronounced in rapidly urbanising states where population growth and increasing demand for land have intensified competition over real property. Oyo State, like many other States, has witnessed its fair share of disputes arising from competing ownership claims, forged survey plans, multiple sales of the same property, illegal occupation and violent attempts to dispossess lawful owners. Such disputes not only burden the courts but also threaten public confidence in the land administration system.
Against this backdrop, the recent launch of the Digital Land Survey Plan Registry (DLSPR) by the Oyo State Government represents a significant milestone in the State’s ongoing efforts to modernise land administration. The initiative seeks to digitise survey records, improve transparency, facilitate verification of survey plans and create a more efficient system for managing land information. While the Registry is primarily an administrative reform, its implications extend far beyond convenience. It has the potential to become one of the most effective institutional tools in strengthening the implementation of the Real Properties Protection Law, 2016, commonly referred to as the Oyo State Anti-Land Grabbing Law.
The Need for Modern Land Administration
Land administration is more than the issuance of titles or maintenance of survey records. It encompasses the processes through which land is identified, surveyed, recorded, transferred and protected. Where these processes are inefficient or susceptible to manipulation, uncertainty inevitably follows.
Historically, many land transactions in Nigeria have depended on physical records maintained in government offices. Manual record-keeping often presents challenges such as deterioration of documents, loss or misplacement of files,
duplication of survey plans and delays in verification. These weaknesses create opportunities for fraudsters to exploit
inconsistencies within the system by producing forged survey plans, altering land descriptions or selling properties to multiple purchasers. Digitisation addresses many of these challenges by creating a centralised, secure and easily
verifiable repository of land information. Through the Digital Land Survey Plan Registry, survey plans can be authenticated more efficiently, data can be better managed and stakeholders can verify the authenticity of survey information with greater certainty. This significantly improves transparency while reducing opportunities for
fraudulent dealings.
Understanding the Menace of Land Grabbing
Land grabbing has evolved into one of the mostserious threats to property ownership in Nigeria. The practice extends beyond mere trespass. It often involves organised groups who deploy intimidation, violence, fraudulent documentation and multiple sales to dispossess legitimate owners or extort money from prospective purchasers and developers.
The Real Properties Protection Law, 2016
defines land grabbing broadly to include the use of force to take over real property for the purpose of demanding fees from property owners, facilitating the commission of a felony, inflicting bodily harm, terrorising persons, selling property unlawfully or disrupting construction activities. This broad definition recognises that land grabbing is not
confined to physical invasion alone but includes a range of coordinated unlawful activities designed to interfere with proprietary rights.
Nigerian Courts in MENE-OKOTIE v. PAN OCEAN OIL CORPORATION (NIG) LTD (2025)
LPELR-81438(SC) have defined land grabbing or trespass to land to mean; “trespass to land also known as Trespass Quare Clausum Fregit is committed where a Defendant without legal justification enters upon a land in possession of
the Plaintiff or remains upon such land or directly places or projects any material object upon such land. Trespass can also refer to an injury to or interference with the quiet possessory right or interest in a land or the slightest disturbance of the possessory rights of the plaintiff over a land or landed property”.
In AYITO v. OQUA & ORS (2025) LPELR81514(SC) the Court defined land grabbing or trespass to land as the disturbance of the possession of land by a person who cannot show a better right to possession than that of the person in possession. Several factors contribute to the persistence of land grabbing. These include rapid urbanisation, increasing land values, inadequate land documentation, family land disputes, delays in land registration, ignorance of proper conveyancing procedures and the existence of criminal syndicates that exploit weaknesses in land administration. In many cases, fraudsters capitalise on poor record management by producing conflicting survey plans or purporting to derive title from questionable sources.
The consequences are often devastating. Property owners are subjected to harassment and threats, legitimate developments are halted, and purchasers who have invested substantial sums find themselves embroiled in lengthy litigation. Developers incur significant financial losses while construction projects suffer delays arising from
disputes that could have been prevented through more reliable land records.
The Socio-Economic Cost of Land Grabbing
The activities of land grabbers have consequences that extend far beyond individual property disputes. At the individual level, victims often lose substantial financial investments, expend considerable resources on litigation and
experience prolonged uncertainty regarding ownership of their properties. For businesses and property developers, land disputes increase the cost of doing business. Projects are delayed, financing arrangements become uncertain and investor confidence is diminished. Financial institutions are likewise affected because land frequently serves as
collateral for lending transactions. Where title to land is uncertain or disputed, lenders becomereluctant to extend credit, thereby restricting access to finance and slowing economic activity. Government also suffers significant losses.
Drawn-out legal disputes reduce revenue generated from land transactions, registration fees and consent applications. Public resources are diverted towards dispute resolution and law enforcement rather than developmental initiatives. Furthermore, illegal occupation and unauthorised developments undermine physical planning and compromise orderly urban growth.
From a broader economic perspective, the prevalence of land grabbing discourages domestic and foreign investment. Investors naturally prefer jurisdictions where property rights are secure, title verification is reliable and disputes are resolved efficiently. Consequently, strengthening land administration is not merely a legal necessity but also an economic imperative.
The Legal Response: The Real Properties Protection Law, 2016
Recognising the gravity of the problem, the Oyo State House of Assembly enacted the Real Properties Protection Law, 2016 to safeguard proprietary rights and criminalise various forms of unlawful conduct relating to real property.
The foundation of the Law lies in section 3, which unequivocally prohibits any person from using force or self-help to take over real property or engage in acts inconsistent with the proprietary rights of the owner or lawful occupant. This provision reinforces the long-established legal principle that disputes concerning land should be resolved through lawful judicial processes rather than through force or intimidation.
The Law further criminalises land grabbing itself. Under section 4, any person who engages in land grabbing commits an offence punishable upon conviction by imprisonment for ten years. Recognising that preparatory acts also threaten public order, section 5 extends criminal liability to attempted land grabbing, while section 6 criminalises aiding or abetting the commission of the offence.
Perhaps one of the most significant provisions is section 7, which addresses the use or threat of
violence in relation to land. The section prohibits any person from employing violence or intimidation to take possession of real property, regardless of any purported claim of ownership. The Law expressly provides that a person’s belief in his right to possession does not constitute lawful authority to resort to violence. Particularly
noteworthy is subsection (4), which criminalises forceful entry involving firearms, offensive weapons, fetish objects or chemical substances, as well as situations where persons acting together inflict violence during such entry.
The Law also addresses unlawful occupation. Under section 8, any person occupying property as a land grabber or under a title derived from a land grabber commits an offence by failing to surrender possession within one month after being required to do so by or on behalf of the lawful owner.
Encroachment is separately prohibited under section 9, reflecting the Legislature’s recognition that unlawful interference with property boundaries frequently escalates into more serious disputes. The Law imposes additional sanctions where encroachers possess firearms or offensive weapons while occupying the property.
Fraudulent dealings in land receive equally robust treatment. Section 10 criminalises offering property for sale without lawful authority, selling land without title, multiple sales of the same property and unauthorised sales of government or family land. Importantly, the Law also provides that property sold unlawfully shall revert to its lawful owner, thereby reinforcing the sanctity of proprietary rights.
The legislation recognises that professionals have a vital role in preserving the integrity of land transactions. Accordingly, section 11 prohibits legal practitioners, estate surveyors, surveyors and other professionals from facilitating transactions they know contravene the Law. Convicted professionals are not only liable to criminal sanctions but may also be reported to their respective professional bodies for disciplinary action.
To discourage abuse of law enforcement mechanisms, Section 12 criminalises frivolous and knowingly false petitions relating to property disputes and requires petitions concerning land to be supported by sworn declarations.
Perhaps most relevant to the historical activities of “omo onile” is section 13, which prohibits the unlawful demand for fees or levies connected with construction activities and criminalises interference with ongoing construction. This provision strikes directly at one of the most common manifestations of land grabbing, namely the extortion of developers under the guise of
customary entitlements.
The Enforcement Role of the Task Force Unit
Recognising that legislation without effective enforcement achieves little, section 1establishes a Task Force Unit responsible for enforcing the provisions of the Law.
Although the statute provides only briefly for its establishment, the practical significance of the Task Force cannot be overstated. It serves as the primary institutional mechanism for investigating complaints, coordinating enforcement activities and working alongside the Nigeria Police Force and other relevant agencies in tackling landrelated criminality.
The effectiveness of the Task Force, however, depends largely upon access to reliable and verifiable information regarding land ownership, boundaries and survey records. Enforcement becomes considerably more difficult where survey plans are conflicting, physical records are unavailable or competing claims cannot readily be verified.
The Digital Land Survey Plan Registry as an Enforcement Tool
It is in this context that the Digital Land Survey Plan Registry assumes particular importance.
Although introduced as an administrative reform aimed at improving land administration, the Registry complements the enforcement objectives of the Real Properties Protection Law by strengthening the evidential and administrative foundations upon which enforcement depends.
A centralised digital database significantly reduces opportunities for forged survey plans, duplicate registrations and conflicting boundary descriptions. Prospective purchasers, legal practitioners, surveyors, financial institutions and government agencies can verify survey information before transactions are concluded, thereby reducing the risk of fraudulent acquisitions.
The Registry also promotes compliance with the Law by making it more difficult for individuals to rely on fabricated survey documents when attempting to assert unlawful claims. Persons contemplating multiple sales or fraudulent conveyances are likely to encounter greater difficulty where authentic survey records are readily accessible for verification.
Benefits for Stakeholders
The benefits of the Digital Land Survey Plan Registry extend across the entire property sector. For investors, the Registry promotes confidence by enhancing certainty in land transactions and reducing the risk of acquiring disputed property. Financial institutions benefit from improved due diligence when accepting land as security for
lending, thereby reducing exposure to defective collateral.
Surveyors gain access to more efficient verification mechanisms that strengthen professional practice and reduce opportunities for manipulation of survey plans.
Legal practitioners are better equipped to advise clients, conduct title investigations and resolve disputes using verified survey information rather than uncertain or conflicting records.
Government agencies benefit from improved coordination, enhanced record management, greater transparency and increased public confidence in land administration.
Ultimately, members of the public stand to gain the most from a system that protects lawful ownership, discourages fraud and facilitates quicker, more reliable land transactions.
Conclusion
The launch of the Digital Land Survey Plan Registry represents far more than a technological upgrade. It signals a deliberate shift towards a modern land administration system in which transparency, accuracy and accountability
become central pillars of governance.
Technology alone cannot eliminate land grabbing. Equally, legislation without reliable administrative infrastructure cannot achieve its full purpose. The Real Properties Protection Law, 2016 provides the legal framework for protecting proprietary rights and criminalising land-related misconduct. The Digital Land Survey Plan Registry, on the other hand, provides the technological infrastructure capable of supporting that framework through accurate record keeping, enhanced due diligence and improved verification of survey information.
Together, they have the potential to transform land administration in Oyo State by reducing fraud, strengthening enforcement, improving investor confidence and safeguarding the proprietary rights of lawful landowners. If effectively implemented, continuously updated and integrated into broader land administration reforms, the Registry could become one of the most significant innovations in the State’s continuing effort to combat land grabbing and promote a secure, transparent and efficient property regime.
If you require any further clarification, do not hesitate to contact us
ABOUT FUNMI ROBERTS & CO
Founded in 1989, Funmi Roberts & Co. (FRC) is a Nigerian law firm providing
legal, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), company secretarial and corporate
governance services.
FRC is committed to delivering bespoke, practical and commercially focused legal
solutions tailored to the needs of its clients. Through the effective use of
technology, innovation and professional expertise, the Firm continues to provide
efficient and quality legal services across diverse areas of practice.
CONTACT US
IBADAN, OYO STATE: 1st Floor, Asabi House, 108 Adekunle Fajuyi Road, Adamasingba, Off Awolowo Road, Ibadan, Oyo State.
LAGOS STATE: 40a Raymond Njoku Crescent, off Awolowo Road, Ikoyi, Lagos State. Tel: +234-803-806-3543; +234902-079-0815
info@funmirobertsandco.com
www.funmirobertsandco.com
Recent Comments